Editors Reads Verdict
Flaubert's last and most radical work is an encyclopaedia of human stupidity structured as a comedy of ideas. Unfinished at his death, it is also — in its relentless, comprehensive, systematic comedy of intellectual failure — perhaps the funniest thing he ever wrote.
What We Loved
- The comedy of systematic intellectual failure is sustained with extraordinary inventiveness across 336 pages
- The satirical range — every branch of human knowledge is covered and found wanting — is genuinely encyclopaedic
- The relationship between Bouvard and Pécuchet is oddly touching — they remain friends through every disaster
- The novel anticipates twentieth-century absurdism in its structural logic
Minor Drawbacks
- The novel was unfinished at Flaubert's death — the planned second volume of quotations was never written
- The systematic satirical repetition can become wearing — the joke is the same joke, repeated
- Requires some knowledge of nineteenth-century intellectual life to appreciate the specific targets
- The most demanding of Flaubert's works to read in sequence
Key Takeaways
- → Human beings are constitutionally unable to achieve the mastery over knowledge they seek — and will keep trying
- → Bêtise (stupidity) is not limited to the uneducated — it is the universal condition of human intellectual endeavour
- → The accumulation of facts without wisdom produces not knowledge but a more sophisticated confusion
- → Friendship can survive the comprehensive failure of every shared project — this is its own kind of heroism
| Author | Gustave Flaubert |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Penguin Classics |
| Pages | 336 |
| Published | March 16, 1881 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Classic Fiction, Satire, French Literature |
Bouvard and Pécuchet Review
Flaubert spent the last decade of his life on Bouvard and Pécuchet, the novel he called his “encyclopaedia of human stupidity,” and died in 1880 without finishing it. The first volume was published posthumously in 1881; the projected second volume, which was to consist entirely of quotations from stupid books — the famous Dictionnaire des idées reçues and a Catalogue des idées chics — exists only in notes and fragments. What we have is therefore incomplete. It is also, for a certain kind of reader, magnificent.
The premise is almost mathematically simple. Bouvard and Pécuchet are copy-clerks in Paris who meet by chance on a park bench and discover they are kindred spirits. When Bouvard inherits a farm in Normandy, they retire together to devote themselves to intellectual improvement. They study agriculture, horticulture, preservation of fruit, architecture, geology, archaeology, history, literature, politics, magnetism, medicine, physiology, metaphysics, religion, education, and love — in that order, more or less. At each subject they apply themselves with genuine enthusiasm, achieve initial confidence, encounter complications, make catastrophic errors, and move on to the next. The pattern does not vary. The disasters do.
Flaubert’s target is bêtise — a French word that means stupidity but carries with it a specific flavour of complacent self-assurance, of received ideas mistaken for genuine thought. The novel’s great joke is that Bouvard and Pécuchet are not fools; they are earnest, enthusiastic, reasonably intelligent men who simply cannot match the ambitions they carry. But the joke extends beyond them: the experts they consult are no better, the books they read are no more reliable, the authorities they trust are no more authoritative. The novel is not a satire of two credulous amateurs but a satire of human intellectual culture as such.
The unfinished state gives the novel a strange quality. We know the projected ending: Bouvard and Pécuchet, having exhausted knowledge and found it wanting, return to copying — but now they copy the stupidities they have collected, the world’s bêtise in their own handwriting. It is the most Flaubertian ending imaginable: a complete circle, a cosmic joke at everyone’s expense, including the author’s. That it was never written is itself, in a Flaubertian register, fitting. The encyclopaedia of stupidity must be, by its own logic, incomplete.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Bouvard and Pécuchet" about?
Two copy-clerks who become friends retire to the countryside and systematically attempt to master every branch of human knowledge — agriculture, chemistry, medicine, archaeology, philosophy, religion — failing at each in turn. Flaubert's unfinished final novel, published posthumously, is his most radical satirical project.
What are the key takeaways from "Bouvard and Pécuchet"?
Human beings are constitutionally unable to achieve the mastery over knowledge they seek — and will keep trying Bêtise (stupidity) is not limited to the uneducated — it is the universal condition of human intellectual endeavour The accumulation of facts without wisdom produces not knowledge but a more sophisticated confusion Friendship can survive the comprehensive failure of every shared project — this is its own kind of heroism
Is "Bouvard and Pécuchet" worth reading?
Flaubert's last and most radical work is an encyclopaedia of human stupidity structured as a comedy of ideas. Unfinished at his death, it is also — in its relentless, comprehensive, systematic comedy of intellectual failure — perhaps the funniest thing he ever wrote.
Ready to Read Bouvard and Pécuchet?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: