Editors Reads Verdict
A dazzlingly ambitious novel that uses the form of magical realism to ask the hardest questions about faith, identity, and belonging — both a masterwork of postcolonial fiction and the most politically consequential novel published since Lolita.
What We Loved
- The transformation of Gibreel and Saladin is the most fertile metaphor in Rushdie's work — it generates endless meaning
- The dream sequences, particularly those recounting the founding of a religion called 'Submission,' are visionary in the strongest sense
- Rushdie's linguistic energy is at its peak — the prose is a sustained performance of almost reckless invention
Minor Drawbacks
- The novel's density and allusiveness make significant demands — it rewards rereading more than first reading
- The political circumstances of the fatwa inevitably color how readers approach it, making purely literary reception nearly impossible
Key Takeaways
- → Migration — the crossing between cultures — is not a metaphor for modernity but its literal condition
- → Sacred texts are human constructions subject to doubt, revision, and the corruptions of power
- → Identity is not given but constructed — and under sufficient pressure, it can transform into its opposite
- → The profane and the sacred are not opposites but versions of each other — this is the novel's deepest theological provocation
| Author | Salman Rushdie |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Random House |
| Pages | 561 |
| Published | September 26, 1988 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Magical Realism, Literary Fiction, Postcolonial Fiction |
The Satanic Verses Review
The Satanic Verses opens with one of the most extraordinary first sentences in contemporary fiction: two men, Gibreel Farishta and Saladin Chamcha, falling from the sky over the English Channel after the explosion of a hijacked Boeing 747 called Bostan. They survive, singing, tumbling, arguing. They are impossible. And from that opening impossibility, Salman Rushdie constructs a novel that is as wide as the history of faith and as specific as the experience of being an Indian immigrant in Thatcher’s Britain.
Gibreel, a Bollywood superstar who has recovered from a near-fatal illness believing God is dead, begins to dream. His dreams are the novel’s most incendiary material: he becomes the Archangel Gabriel to a prophet named Mahound, who is building a new religion called Submission in a city called Jahilia. These sequences are Rushdie’s direct engagement with the origins of Islam — fictional, satirical, and obviously intended as such — and they are what triggered the fatwa. They are also, read on their own terms, extraordinary: visionary narrative in the mode of Blake or Dante, not mockery but inquiry.
Saladin, who has spent his life erasing his Indianness in favor of a precisely cultivated English identity — voice coach, theatrical background, the whole apparatus of self-reinvention — becomes literally demonic during his transformation. He grows hooves, horns, and a monstrous body. The British police, encountering him after the crash, treat this not as a miraculous event but as confirmation of what they already believe: he is foreign, threatening, other. The supernatural transformation is Rushdie’s most precise image of how racism works — the Other is made monstrous by the gaze of the majority, and eventually begins to believe in the monstrousness himself.
Reading The Satanic Verses in the shadow of the fatwa — which is the only way it can now be read — requires a conscious effort to see the novel rather than its circumstances. It is a demanding but ultimately generous work, full of Rushdie’s characteristic linguistic excess, his love of Bombay and London, his deep engagement with the history of faith as a human rather than divine creation. The political circumstances surrounding it are part of its meaning but not all of it. It is the work of a novelist at the height of his powers, asking the questions that fiction is uniquely positioned to ask about the sacred, the profane, and the impossible.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "The Satanic Verses" about?
Two Indian actors survive the explosion of a hijacked plane over the English Channel — one becomes angelic, the other demonic. Rushdie's most controversial novel is also his most formally ambitious: a vast, satirical, visionary work about migration, identity, faith, and the relationship between the sacred and the profane. The Iranian fatwa issued against Rushdie in 1989 makes it the most politically significant novel of the late twentieth century.
What are the key takeaways from "The Satanic Verses"?
Migration — the crossing between cultures — is not a metaphor for modernity but its literal condition Sacred texts are human constructions subject to doubt, revision, and the corruptions of power Identity is not given but constructed — and under sufficient pressure, it can transform into its opposite The profane and the sacred are not opposites but versions of each other — this is the novel's deepest theological provocation
Is "The Satanic Verses" worth reading?
A dazzlingly ambitious novel that uses the form of magical realism to ask the hardest questions about faith, identity, and belonging — both a masterwork of postcolonial fiction and the most politically consequential novel published since Lolita.
Ready to Read The Satanic Verses?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: