Editors Reads Verdict
In 128 pages, Bulgakov demolishes the Soviet project's central claim — that human nature can be improved by ideological engineering — with a surgical wit and economy that The Master and Margarita, for all its brilliance, could not match. Suppressed for sixty years, it has survived everything.
What We Loved
- The central conceit — the New Soviet Man as a surgical experiment on a street dog — is the perfect satirical metaphor
- Sharikov, the transformed dog, is one of Soviet literature's most terrifying characters: not a monster but a product
- Bulgakov's economy is remarkable — there is no wasted sentence, no digression, no excess
- Professor Preobrazhensky's voice — patrician, precise, appalled — is one of the great comic-serious voices in Russian fiction
Minor Drawbacks
- The novella's brevity means some implications are sketched rather than developed
- The satirical targets are so specific to Soviet ideology that some context helps to appreciate the full precision of the attack
Key Takeaways
- → The New Soviet Man, if created by surgery rather than ideology, would be exactly what Soviet ideology produces: crude, aggressive, and politically useful
- → The educated professional under Soviet power is in an impossible position — needed, despised, and ultimately vulnerable
- → Nature, in Bulgakov, always reasserts itself against the ideological attempt to override it
- → Bureaucracy is not inefficiency but a weapon — the housing committee is more dangerous than any individual
| Author | Mikhail Bulgakov |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Grove Press |
| Pages | 128 |
| Published | January 1, 1925 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, Russian Literature, Satirical Fiction |
The Heart of a Dog Review
The experiment is simple, outrageous, and brilliant in the way that the best satirical conceits are: what if the Soviet project of creating a New Soviet Man were literalized as an actual surgical procedure? Professor Philip Philipovich Preobrazhensky — a renowned Moscow surgeon living in the luxury of a full seven-room apartment — operates on a stray dog called Sharik, replacing the dog’s pituitary gland and testicles with those of a recently deceased human criminal. The dog transforms, with surprising speed, into a human being. The human being, named Polygraph Polygraphovich Sharikov, turns out to be exactly what the experiment predicts: the social product of the Soviet experiment, made flesh.
Bulgakov wrote this novella in 1925, one of the most ferociously energetic periods of Soviet ideology, and it was immediately confiscated by the secret police. It was not published in Russia until 1987 — sixty-two years after it was written — and it has been recognized since its Western publication as one of the most concentrated pieces of political satire in the twentieth century. The suppression tells you everything about its accuracy.
Sharikov is not a monster — this is essential to the satire. He is crude, sexually aggressive, resentful of his betters, and ideologically perfect: he immediately makes common cause with the house committee chairman Shvonder, files formal complaints about the professor who made him, and finds employment as a purger of stray cats for the Moscow cleansing department. He is, in every respect, the New Soviet Man — not because ideology has improved a human being but because ideology has found a use for the worst of human nature. The surgery did not create Sharikov; it merely gave the Soviet system access to qualities it already needed.
Professor Preobrazhensky, aristocratic and irreplaceable (he performs rejuvenation procedures on the Party elite), represents the educated professional class that Soviet power both depends on and cannot tolerate. His running argument with Shvonder and Sharikov is the novella’s comedy and its tragedy simultaneously: the professor is always right, always more intelligent, always more articulate, and entirely powerless in the face of a bureaucratic and political system that is organized against him. The ending — the reversal of the experiment, Sharikov returned to doghood — is both relief and indictment. The professor can restore the dog, but he cannot restore the society the experiment represents.
Our rating: 4.5/5 — The most precisely targeted political satire in Russian literature, written with an economy and a wickedness that makes it impossible to put down and impossible to forget.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "The Heart of a Dog" about?
A Moscow street dog is given a human pituitary gland and testicles by a surgeon, transforms into a crude, politically useful Soviet citizen, and must eventually be returned to his original state. Bulgakov's suppressed novella is the most precise literary satire of Soviet ideology ever written — the experiment of creating the New Soviet Man literalized as a surgical procedure with predictable results.
What are the key takeaways from "The Heart of a Dog"?
The New Soviet Man, if created by surgery rather than ideology, would be exactly what Soviet ideology produces: crude, aggressive, and politically useful The educated professional under Soviet power is in an impossible position — needed, despised, and ultimately vulnerable Nature, in Bulgakov, always reasserts itself against the ideological attempt to override it Bureaucracy is not inefficiency but a weapon — the housing committee is more dangerous than any individual
Is "The Heart of a Dog" worth reading?
In 128 pages, Bulgakov demolishes the Soviet project's central claim — that human nature can be improved by ideological engineering — with a surgical wit and economy that The Master and Margarita, for all its brilliance, could not match. Suppressed for sixty years, it has survived everything.
Ready to Read The Heart of a Dog?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: