Editors Reads Verdict
Bellow's last novel is one of his most intimate: the portrait of a brilliant, extravagant, courageous friend who died too soon, and of the friendship between two men who loved each other across every kind of difference.
What We Loved
- Bellow's most intimate and personally vulnerable novel—written at 85, it has nothing to prove
- The portrait of Bloom/Ravelstein is one of the finest in American biographical fiction
- The friendship between Chick and Ravelstein is rendered with extraordinary warmth and precision
- Bellow's late prose is at its most relaxed and most penetrating
Minor Drawbacks
- Readers unfamiliar with Allan Bloom or The Closing of the American Mind may miss some resonances
- The fictionalization of real people raised controversy at publication—Bloom's colleagues protested
- Chick's near-death episode (from food poisoning) can feel structurally loose
Key Takeaways
- → Friendship between intellectuals is a form of love that sustains a life even when other relationships fail
- → Extravagance and austerity can coexist in the same person without contradiction
- → The dying person who assigns their biographer gives a last form of control over their legacy
- → Looking at death directly—one's own or a friend's—is a philosophical and personal discipline
- → The best portrait of a person is not the most accurate but the most loving and most honest simultaneously
| Author | Saul Bellow |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Penguin Books |
| Pages | 240 |
| Published | March 1, 2001 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, Biographical Fiction, American Literature |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Readers of Bellow's later work, readers interested in academic intellectual life, and readers drawn to novels about friendship and mortality. |
Ravelstein
Allan Bloom published The Closing of the American Mind in 1987 and it became, against all expectation, a bestseller: a professor of political philosophy from the University of Chicago arguing that American higher education had destroyed its students’ capacity for serious thought. The money this made him was enormous and he spent it immediately, lavishly, and with great pleasure—on clothes, restaurants, trips to Paris, on the apartment in Chicago and the one in Paris, on wine and friends and students. Bloom was openly gay at a time when this was not the default academic position, died of AIDS in 1992, and asked Bellow to write his life.
Bellow’s Ravelstein is both faithful portrait and literary creation. The University of Chicago professor, the Socratic teacher who produced devoted students, the man whose asceticism (of intellectual standards, of philosophical demands) coexisted paradoxically with wild material extravagance—all of these are recognizably Bloom. What Bellow adds is the perspective of Chick, the narrator who is unmistakably Bellow himself, an elderly novelist watching his younger friend with a mixture of admiration, incomprehension, and love.
Ravelstein’s intellectual world—the political philosophy of Leo Strauss, the reading of Plato and Aristotle as a guide to life, the conviction that Eros is inseparable from education—is rendered by Bellow with the warmth of a non-philosopher who has absorbed it by proximity. He does not endorse Ravelstein’s positions but he takes them seriously, which is itself a form of respect that the novel’s subject would have recognized and appreciated.
The Friendship
The novel’s center is not Ravelstein’s ideas or even his death, but the friendship between the two men. Chick and Ravelstein have been friends for decades: they argue about everything, they laugh at each other’s foibles, they share a Chicago that is the backdrop to both their lives, and they love each other in the specific way that long intellectual friendships between men of different characters can produce—a love that is clear-eyed about its object’s limitations and all the more affectionate for that clarity.
Ravelstein asks Chick to write his memoir for a specific reason: he knows that the people who love him most clearly are his students, and he knows that his students will produce hagiography. He wants Chick, who is not a philosopher, who does not share his political convictions, who occasionally finds him ridiculous, to write the true version—the version that includes the extravagance and the comedy and the humanity alongside the philosophical greatness.
Bellow’s response to this commission is the novel itself, and the act of writing it is represented within it: Chick figures out how to write about Ravelstein, fails, tries again, discovers that what he most wants to say about his friend is also the most difficult to say, and eventually writes what we are reading. This reflexive structure—the portrait being painted as its own subject—is one of the things that makes Ravelstein more than a roman à clef.
Bellow’s Final Word
Bellow published Ravelstein in 2000, when he was 85. It was his last novel, though he did not know that when he wrote it, and it has the quality of a late work: relaxed in its prose, confident in its digressive intelligence, unworried about whether it is succeeding by conventional standards. The near-death episode—Chick nearly dies of food poisoning in the Caribbean, and his recovery involves a sustained meditation on what it is to come back from the edge—may be structurally loose, but it has the integrity of autobiography: it happened (something similar happened to Bellow), and it is part of what the novel is about.
What the novel is about, at its deepest level, is how we look at death. Ravelstein looked at his own death—from AIDS—with a philosophical courage that Chick admires and cannot entirely match. Chick’s own near-death gives him a different perspective, one that is less philosophical and more personal. Together, the two deaths—one completed, one survived—constitute a meditation on mortality that is the most honest thing Bellow ever wrote about the subject. The Nobel Prize came in 1976; Ravelstein, twenty-four years later, is where the laureate settled his accounts.
Our rating: 4.1/5 — Bellow’s most intimate novel, and one of the finest portraits of intellectual friendship in American literature. Essential late Bellow.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Ravelstein" about?
Bellow's last novel is a portrait of his friend Allan Bloom (renamed Ravelstein)—a philosopher who wrote a bestseller, spent the money lavishly, and then died of AIDS. Chick, the narrator, is clearly Bellow himself. A meditation on friendship, mortality, and the specific kind of love that can exist between two men whose wives and students cannot entirely share.
Who should read "Ravelstein"?
Readers of Bellow's later work, readers interested in academic intellectual life, and readers drawn to novels about friendship and mortality.
What are the key takeaways from "Ravelstein"?
Friendship between intellectuals is a form of love that sustains a life even when other relationships fail Extravagance and austerity can coexist in the same person without contradiction The dying person who assigns their biographer gives a last form of control over their legacy Looking at death directly—one's own or a friend's—is a philosophical and personal discipline The best portrait of a person is not the most accurate but the most loving and most honest simultaneously
Is "Ravelstein" worth reading?
Bellow's last novel is one of his most intimate: the portrait of a brilliant, extravagant, courageous friend who died too soon, and of the friendship between two men who loved each other across every kind of difference.
Ready to Read Ravelstein?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: