Editors Reads Verdict
Bellow's debut is the seed of everything he would do: the anxious intellectual in suspension, the question of how to act when the world has withdrawn its certainties, the journal form as the only adequate response to having no position from which to speak.
What We Loved
- The seed form of everything Bellow would go on to achieve—essential for understanding his career
- Joseph's predicament is rendered with remarkable precision and honesty
- The Dostoevsky influence is productive rather than imitative
- At 192 pages it is Bellow's most concentrated statement of his central themes
Minor Drawbacks
- Joseph is less fully realized than Bellow's later protagonists—the influence of his models is more visible
- The journal form limits the dramatic range available to the novel
- Readers coming to this after Herzog or Augie March may find it thin by comparison
Key Takeaways
- → Suspension—having no clear position or role—is not a temporary state but a philosophical condition
- → The intellectual who sees through everything is left with no ground to act from
- → The journal form is the natural expression of a self that has no audience and no certainty
- → Being drafted—being assigned a role by the state—is a relief as much as a loss of freedom
- → Bellow's American intellectuals are shaped by European existentialism but formed by Chicago
| Author | Saul Bellow |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Penguin Books |
| Pages | 192 |
| Published | January 31, 2006 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, Modernist Fiction, American Literature |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Readers of Bellow who want to understand his development, or readers interested in wartime American intellectual life and the European existentialist novel's influence on American fiction. |
Joseph in Suspension
The dangling man’s predicament is precisely calibrated: Joseph has quit his job to wait for his draft notice, which is delayed by a bureaucratic error. He is not yet a soldier; he is no longer a civilian in any functioning sense. He has no employment, no daily structure, no social role. His wife Iva supports them; his friends are embarrassed by his idleness; his family is impatient with his refusal to simply get on with things. He does nothing, and in doing nothing he examines the conditions of his existence with an intelligence that makes him miserable and impossible to live with.
The journal he keeps is not a record of events—there are almost no events—but a record of states of mind, encounters, arguments, memories, and reflections. Joseph is capable of intense irritability (a neighbor’s radio, a relative’s thoughtlessness) and occasional moments of genuine vision, but mostly he simply dangles: unable to act, unable not to think, unable to find a position in the world that is both honest and livable.
What Bellow captures with particular exactness is the way Joseph’s very intelligence makes his situation worse. He can see through every available social performance—the businessman’s role, the family man’s role, the cheerful citizen’s role—which means he cannot take any of them up unselfconsciously. His awareness of the performed quality of ordinary social life leaves him without the unconsciousness that makes performance bearable. He is stranded in the gap between seeing through things and having something better to put in their place.
The Dostoevsky Influence
Bellow was explicit about his debt to Dostoevsky in writing Dangling Man, and the influence of Notes from Underground is visible in almost every aspect of the novel. The Underground Man—the spiteful, hyperconscious inhabitant of his own basement, who sees everything and does nothing, who resents the people he cannot not need—is the prototype for Joseph. The journal form, the self-accusation, the oscillation between grandiosity and self-contempt, the relationship between excessive consciousness and paralysis: all of these come from Dostoevsky.
What Bellow adds to this inheritance is an American setting, a Jewish intellectual background, and a wartime context that makes the Underground Man’s predicament historically specific. Joseph is not simply a philosophical type—he is a man of a particular time and place, whose suspension is shaped by the war that has not yet taken him, by the Chicago he grew up in, by the intellectual tradition (Marxist, Jewish, secular) that has given him his categories and then withdrawn its certainties.
The Kafka influence is less visible but equally present: the bureaucratic delay that keeps Joseph in suspension, the sense that some large, impersonal mechanism is operating on his life without his understanding or consent, the waiting that may end at any moment or never. These elements from Kafka’s world give Dangling Man’s realism a slightly tilted quality—a sense that the ordinary world is being observed from slightly outside its own assumptions.
Bellow’s First Novel
Dangling Man was published in 1944, when Bellow was twenty-eight. It was followed by The Victim (1947), then by The Adventures of Augie March (1953), which announced the fully formed Bellow—expansive, comic, intellectually exuberant—to the world. The contrast between the compression of Dangling Man and the abundance of Augie March is one of the most dramatic developments in postwar American fiction, and understanding Dangling Man is essential to understanding what Bellow broke free from in writing the later novel.
The ending of Dangling Man is one of the most ambiguous in Bellow’s career: Joseph’s draft notice finally arrives, and he responds with relief—“Long live regimentation!”—that is simultaneously ironic and genuine. Being absorbed into an institution, having a role assigned, being told what to do: these are losses of freedom, but freedom without ground is the condition Joseph has been suffering. The soldier’s loss of freedom is at least a defined loss, a known quantity. The dangling man’s suspension was something worse: freedom with no content. Bellow received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1976; Dangling Man remains the key to understanding the anxious intellectual who would generate that achievement.
Our rating: 3.9/5 — Bellow’s most concentrated and vulnerable novel, and the essential seed of his career. Start here if you want to understand what he was doing everywhere else.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Dangling Man" about?
Chicago, 1942. Joseph, waiting to be drafted, keeps a journal for seven months. He has left his job; he cannot do anything else; he hangs in suspension. Bellow's first novel—written under the influence of Dostoevsky and Kafka—is the purest statement of the anxious intellectual that would define his career.
Who should read "Dangling Man"?
Readers of Bellow who want to understand his development, or readers interested in wartime American intellectual life and the European existentialist novel's influence on American fiction.
What are the key takeaways from "Dangling Man"?
Suspension—having no clear position or role—is not a temporary state but a philosophical condition The intellectual who sees through everything is left with no ground to act from The journal form is the natural expression of a self that has no audience and no certainty Being drafted—being assigned a role by the state—is a relief as much as a loss of freedom Bellow's American intellectuals are shaped by European existentialism but formed by Chicago
Is "Dangling Man" worth reading?
Bellow's debut is the seed of everything he would do: the anxious intellectual in suspension, the question of how to act when the world has withdrawn its certainties, the journal form as the only adequate response to having no position from which to speak.
Ready to Read Dangling Man?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: