Editors Reads Verdict
The greatest Scandinavian novel of the twentieth century: Laxness creates in Bjartur a hero who is simultaneously magnificent and monstrous, whose absolute freedom costs everyone around him their lives and happiness—and who is, by the end, stripped of everything except his obstinate, unconquerable will.
What We Loved
- One of the genuinely great novels of the twentieth century — Bjartur is among literature's most memorable characters
- The Icelandic landscape rendered with mythological force and documentary precision simultaneously
- The novel manages to be simultaneously comic and tragic, epic and intimate
- Laxness's prose (in Magnus Magnusson's translation) is superb — weighted, ironic, and deeply humane
Minor Drawbacks
- At 512 pages it demands a substantial commitment
- The relentlessness of Bjartur's suffering — and his causing of others' suffering — can be genuinely hard to bear
- Some readers find Bjartur so frustrating that the novel becomes difficult to continue
Key Takeaways
- → Independence as an absolute value destroys the very relationships that make a life worth living
- → The Icelandic peasant tradition of stubborn self-sufficiency is both the country's greatest strength and its greatest curse
- → Poverty is not a character flaw but a structural condition — and those who romanticize it cause enormous harm
- → The land shapes the people who work it: Bjartur and the Icelandic moor are versions of each other
- → Love and pride are not easily compatible — those who refuse dependence often refuse love along with it
| Author | Halldór Laxness |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Vintage International |
| Pages | 512 |
| Published | October 28, 1997 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, Epic Fiction, Icelandic Literature |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Serious readers of literary fiction ready for a substantial, demanding novel; those interested in Scandinavian literature; readers who appreciate epic novels built around a single, overwhelming character. |
Bjartur of Summerhouses
Bjartur of Summerhouses is one of the most extraordinary characters in twentieth-century literature. He is a crofter — a subsistence sheep farmer — who has spent eighteen years in bonded labor on another man’s farm to pay for the right to work his own land. Now free, he builds his croft on a patch of Icelandic moorland and commits himself to a single, absolute value: independence.
Not comfort. Not happiness. Not love. Independence. Bjartur will owe nothing to no one and be dependent on no one for anything. He will raise his sheep and his children and manage his debt and face the Icelandic winter on these terms, and if people suffer as a result — if his wife dies in childbirth because he refused to borrow a neighbor’s horse to fetch the midwife, if his daughter Ásta Sóllilja grows up unloved and eventually destroyed — well, that is the price of independence, and the price is worth paying.
Laxness’s genius is that he makes this man simultaneously heroic and monstrous, ridiculous and magnificent. Bjartur is not a villain. He is a man with a single, total commitment to a value, and that commitment is, in its way, admirable — it is what makes him capable of surviving what the novel puts him through. But it is also what makes him incapable of giving or receiving the love that would make survival worthwhile. By the novel’s end, stripped of everything — wife, children, farm, animals — he is still Bjartur of Summerhouses, still himself, still walking forward. It is both terrible and, somehow, magnificent.
Iceland’s Landscape
Laxness uses the Icelandic landscape — the moor, the bog, the river in flood, the mountain passes in winter, the particular quality of the northern light — as an extension of Bjartur’s character. The land is as implacable as the man: it offers nothing, takes everything, and does not care about the people who work it. The sheep’s diseases, the failed harvests, the snowstorms that kill animals and occasionally people — these are not dramatic devices but the literal conditions of Icelandic subsistence farming rendered with documentary precision.
At the same time, the landscape has a mythological dimension. Iceland’s ancient literary culture — the sagas, the Eddas, the poetry that Bjartur loves and recites — runs through the novel as a counterpoint to the realist surface. When Bjartur recites Icelandic poetry to himself while digging sheep out of snowdrifts, Laxness is showing us a man who lives simultaneously in the mythological heroic tradition and in the brutal material conditions of early twentieth-century rural poverty. The combination is what makes Independent People something other than regional realism: it is an epic in the strict sense, concerned with heroes and their relationship to fate.
The landscape also makes the political argument. Bjartur’s independence is not merely personal stubbornness: it is the defining Icelandic value, the national character in concentrated form. The novel asks, with devastating patience, what that value costs when it is taken to its logical extreme.
The Nobel Prize in Iceland
Halldór Laxness won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1955, and Independent People (originally published in Icelandic in two volumes in 1934 and 1935) was the primary reason. The prize’s reception in Iceland was complicated. Laxness was a communist sympathizer, and his novel can be read as a critique of Icelandic peasant culture’s most celebrated value — the independence that Bjartur embodies to such devastating effect. Some Icelanders felt the portrait was an attack on national character; others recognized it as the greatest portrait of that character ever made.
The controversy is itself revealing: Independent People is simultaneously a love letter to Icelandic stubbornness and a merciless examination of its costs. Laxness clearly loves Bjartur — you cannot write 512 pages about a man without some profound identification — and equally clearly sees him as catastrophic. This dual vision is what makes the novel great: it refuses to resolve into either celebration or condemnation, holding both responses in productive tension across five hundred pages.
Our rating: 4.5/5 — One of the great novels of the twentieth century: Bjartur of Summerhouses is among literature’s unforgettable characters, and his story is as large and as unsparing as the Icelandic moor.
Reading Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Independent People" about?
Bjartur of Summerhouses has spent eighteen years in bondage to pay for his croft. Now free, he will be independent or die. Through drought, famine, debt, and the deaths of those he might have loved, Bjartur's stubbornness is heroic and catastrophic in equal measure. Laxness's masterpiece—the great Icelandic novel, and the reason he won the Nobel Prize.
Who should read "Independent People"?
Serious readers of literary fiction ready for a substantial, demanding novel; those interested in Scandinavian literature; readers who appreciate epic novels built around a single, overwhelming character.
What are the key takeaways from "Independent People"?
Independence as an absolute value destroys the very relationships that make a life worth living The Icelandic peasant tradition of stubborn self-sufficiency is both the country's greatest strength and its greatest curse Poverty is not a character flaw but a structural condition — and those who romanticize it cause enormous harm The land shapes the people who work it: Bjartur and the Icelandic moor are versions of each other Love and pride are not easily compatible — those who refuse dependence often refuse love along with it
Is "Independent People" worth reading?
The greatest Scandinavian novel of the twentieth century: Laxness creates in Bjartur a hero who is simultaneously magnificent and monstrous, whose absolute freedom costs everyone around him their lives and happiness—and who is, by the end, stripped of everything except his obstinate, unconquerable will.
Ready to Read Independent People?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: