Editors Reads Verdict
Go Set a Watchman is a more troubling and in some ways more honest book than To Kill a Mockingbird — a study of the moment when we discover our parents are fallible, and what we make of what they actually believe rather than what we needed them to believe.
What We Loved
- Jean Louise's confrontation with her own idealization of Atticus is genuinely powerful — Lee handles the emotional devastation with real skill
- The novel is more interested in moral complexity than its predecessor — the discomfort it provokes is productive rather than careless
- The portrait of Maycomb in the mid-1950s, during the early civil rights movement, has historical specificity that Mockingbird, set in the thirties, could not have
Minor Drawbacks
- The prose is rougher than To Kill a Mockingbird — this is a first draft, and the uneven craft is visible throughout
- The discovery of Atticus's racial views remains the subject of genuine controversy about the book's intentionality
- The circumstances of the novel's publication — Lee was elderly and in poor health — have raised questions that cannot be fully resolved
Key Takeaways
- → The heroes of our childhood are people, not archetypes — and the work of adulthood includes accepting this
- → Idealization is a failure of perception, and the correction of idealization is not the same as disillusionment
- → The civil rights era required white Southerners to choose, and the choices many of them made were not what their admirers would have wished
- → Jean Louise's conscience — the watchman of the title — is her own; she must learn to stand on it rather than borrow Atticus's
| Author | Harper Lee |
|---|---|
| Publisher | HarperCollins |
| Pages | 278 |
| Published | July 14, 2015 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, American Literature, Southern Fiction |
Go Set a Watchman Review
Go Set a Watchman arrived in 2015 amid controversy it has never entirely escaped. Harper Lee was eighty-eight years old, in failing health, and had spent decades declining to publish a second novel. The manuscript had apparently been assumed lost and was rediscovered in 2014. Whether Lee fully understood what was being published in her name, and whether she gave genuinely informed consent, are questions that responsible readers cannot set aside. With those caveats registered, the novel itself is a more interesting book than the furious reaction to it suggested.
Jean Louise Finch — Scout, grown — is twenty-six and living in New York. She returns to Maycomb, Alabama in the mid-1950s for her annual visit to Atticus, who is now in his seventies and suffering from arthritis. During the visit she discovers, through a pamphlet she finds and through attending a Citizens’ Council meeting with Atticus, that her father holds views on race and integration that she cannot reconcile with the man who once defended Tom Robinson and taught her that all people deserved equal justice. The novel is structured around this discovery and Jean Louise’s attempt to process it — first through rage, then through her uncle’s intervention, and finally through a conversation with Atticus that reaches no comfortable resolution.
The controversy focused almost entirely on Atticus’s views, and the shock is real: the moral hero of To Kill a Mockingbird turns out, in this telling, to be a paternalist who opposes integration on the grounds that Black Southerners are not ready for it — a position that was common among moderate white Southerners of the period and that the civil rights movement directly challenged. Lee does not redeem Atticus. What she does instead is insist, through Jean Louise’s uncle, that the discovery of a parent’s fallibility is not the end of love but a necessary stage in the development of a moral self. Jean Louise must learn to stand on her own conscience rather than borrow her father’s.
This is not a fully realized novel — the prose is rougher than Mockingbird, the structure looser, and the flashback sections that occupy much of the middle are more reminiscent of short stories than chapters. But the central insight is braver than anything in the earlier book: that the moral clarity we attribute to our heroes often tells us more about our need for heroes than about the heroes themselves.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Go Set a Watchman" about?
Scout Finch, now Jean Louise and twenty-six, returns to Maycomb from New York to visit her father — and discovers that Atticus Finch holds views on race and segregation she cannot reconcile with the man she idolized.
What are the key takeaways from "Go Set a Watchman"?
The heroes of our childhood are people, not archetypes — and the work of adulthood includes accepting this Idealization is a failure of perception, and the correction of idealization is not the same as disillusionment The civil rights era required white Southerners to choose, and the choices many of them made were not what their admirers would have wished Jean Louise's conscience — the watchman of the title — is her own; she must learn to stand on it rather than borrow Atticus's
Is "Go Set a Watchman" worth reading?
Go Set a Watchman is a more troubling and in some ways more honest book than To Kill a Mockingbird — a study of the moment when we discover our parents are fallible, and what we make of what they actually believe rather than what we needed them to believe.
Ready to Read Go Set a Watchman?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: