Editors Reads Verdict
Shakespeare's most exuberant structural achievement — a play in which comedy, fantasy, and a meditation on the irrational nature of love are held in a balance so effortless it looks easy, and is anything but.
What We Loved
- The three-world structure — Athenian court, fairy realm, and the mechanicals — is a masterclass in comic counterpoint
- Bottom is one of Shakespeare's great comic creations, unflappable in the face of the impossible
- The play's meditation on love as a form of temporary madness is funnier and more philosophically serious than it first appears
Minor Drawbacks
- The four young lovers are deliberately interchangeable, which is the point but can make their scenes feel thin compared to Bottom's or Oberon's
- The resolution is too tidy — the lovers' reconciliations feel granted by the plot rather than earned by character
Key Takeaways
- → Love is presented not as a rational choice but as an enchantment that descends without reason and can be redirected at will
- → The mechanicals' play-within-a-play invites the audience to reflect on the nature of theatrical illusion itself
- → The fairy world is not a fantasy escape but a projection of the irrational forces that drive the human plot
- → Bottom's serene acceptance of the extraordinary is a comic philosophy in miniature — a refusal to be destabilized by the marvellous
| Author | William Shakespeare |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Simon & Schuster |
| Pages | 256 |
| Published | January 1, 1600 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Drama, Classic Literature, Classic Fiction |
A Midsummer Night’s Dream Review
A Midsummer Night’s Dream is the play that confirms Shakespeare was doing something no one had done before — not just writing well, but constructing dramatic architectures of unusual ambition. Three worlds coexist in it: the Athenian court where Hermia defies her father and the law; the fairy realm where Oberon and Titania fight over a changeling boy; and the workshop of Bottom the weaver, where artisans rehearse a tragedy about Pyramus and Thisbe. These worlds should not cohere. They cohere completely.
The forest scenes, in which Puck applies love potion to the wrong sleeping Athenian and the four lovers end up chasing each other in a knot of desire and rejection, are as funny as anything in the canon — but the comedy has a slightly unsettling edge. Love here is not romantic destiny; it is a chemical accident, a trick of the eyes, indifferent to its object. Titania falls in love with a man who has been given a donkey’s head. The four lovers shift their allegiances overnight. The play does not resolve this unsettling premise so much as it allows the enchantment to lift and everyone to gratefully forget.
Bottom is the play’s secret moral centre. Where the lovers are unmade by the forest, Bottom is perfectly at home in it. His equanimity in the face of the impossible — he accepts being loved by the Queen of the Fairies with cheerful, bovine good grace — is one of Shakespeare’s great comic strokes. The play closes with Puck’s address to the audience: if we were offended, we only dreamed it. It is the lightest of exits from a play that has been, underneath its lightness, rather searching.
This Folger Shakespeare Library edition provides authoritative text with full glosses and performance annotations.
Reviewed edition: Folger Shakespeare Library / Simon & Schuster (ISBN 0743477561)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "A Midsummer Night's Dream" about?
Four young lovers flee into an enchanted Athens forest where Oberon and Titania quarrel, Puck applies love potion to the wrong eyes, and Bottom the weaver acquires a donkey's head. Shakespeare's most purely comic play is also his most formally inventive — three interlocking worlds that never quite touch but mutually illuminate each other.
What are the key takeaways from "A Midsummer Night's Dream"?
Love is presented not as a rational choice but as an enchantment that descends without reason and can be redirected at will The mechanicals' play-within-a-play invites the audience to reflect on the nature of theatrical illusion itself The fairy world is not a fantasy escape but a projection of the irrational forces that drive the human plot Bottom's serene acceptance of the extraordinary is a comic philosophy in miniature — a refusal to be destabilized by the marvellous
Is "A Midsummer Night's Dream" worth reading?
Shakespeare's most exuberant structural achievement — a play in which comedy, fantasy, and a meditation on the irrational nature of love are held in a balance so effortless it looks easy, and is anything but.
Ready to Read A Midsummer Night's Dream?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: