Editors Reads Verdict
The summit of Shakespeare's achievement and arguably of English literature — a play that stares into the worst the world can do to a person and refuses to look away or offer comfort.
What We Loved
- The scale of the suffering is matched by the scale of the philosophical inquiry — Lear asks what we owe each other and what the world owes us, and answers with storm and darkness
- The Gloucester subplot is not padding but a structural mirror that amplifies every theme of the main plot
- The Fool is one of Shakespeare's most inspired creations — the only character who tells Lear the truth, in the only form Lear can almost hear it
Minor Drawbacks
- The play's relentless devastation can feel punishing — Cordelia's death in the final scene has struck audiences since the seventeenth century as too much
- The subplot requires careful staging to prevent the play's running time from becoming oppressive
Key Takeaways
- → The play's central question — what do children owe parents, and parents children? — is never answered, only illuminated from every possible angle
- → Madness here is not simply pathology but a form of truth-telling that reason cannot access
- → The storm on the heath is the play's symbolic centre: Lear exposed to the elements is civilization stripped to what it actually is
- → Cordelia's death refuses the consolations of poetic justice — the good are not rewarded, and the universe does not adjust itself to human desert
| Author | William Shakespeare |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Simon & Schuster |
| Pages | 368 |
| Published | January 1, 1606 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Drama, Classic Literature, Classic Fiction |
King Lear Review
King Lear is the play that breaks the rules. Every other great tragedy offers some form of structural consolation — Hamlet’s revenge is completed, Macbeth’s tyranny is ended, Othello recovers his self-knowledge in his final speech. Lear offers none of this. Cordelia is hanged. The good die, the wicked die, and the old king dies holding the body of his youngest daughter asking whether she might yet be alive. The wheel has come full circle, and there is nothing to show for it.
This is not a flaw. It is the play’s argument. Shakespeare is testing, with forensic deliberateness, how much suffering a dramatic structure can bear without collapsing into meaninglessness — and what he discovers is that the structure does not collapse, that it holds, that the suffering has a philosophical coherence even without a moral point. Lear is punished far beyond what his initial vanity deserves. Gloucester loses his eyes for loyalty. Cordelia dies for honesty. The play does not explain this. It just shows it.
What makes Lear endurable — what keeps it a play rather than a document of despair — is the quality of the human connections within it. The scenes between Lear and the Fool on the heath; the blinded Gloucester led by his unrecognized son Edgar; the reunion of Lear and Cordelia, brief and ruinous, in Act IV — these are moments of such concentrated feeling that they work against the darkness rather than being cancelled by it. The play insists that love is real even in a world that does not reward it.
Dr Johnson famously could not bear to re-read the final scene. That response is the play working exactly as intended.
This Folger Shakespeare Library edition presents the Folio text with full critical and textual notes.
Reviewed edition: Folger Shakespeare Library / Simon & Schuster (ISBN 074347574X)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "King Lear" about?
An ageing king divides his kingdom between his daughters based on their professions of love, disowns the one who refuses to flatter him, and descends into madness on the heath while his kingdom fractures around him. King Lear is Shakespeare's greatest tragedy — the most philosophically ambitious, the most emotionally devastating, and the most resistant to consolation.
What are the key takeaways from "King Lear"?
The play's central question — what do children owe parents, and parents children? — is never answered, only illuminated from every possible angle Madness here is not simply pathology but a form of truth-telling that reason cannot access The storm on the heath is the play's symbolic centre: Lear exposed to the elements is civilization stripped to what it actually is Cordelia's death refuses the consolations of poetic justice — the good are not rewarded, and the universe does not adjust itself to human desert
Is "King Lear" worth reading?
The summit of Shakespeare's achievement and arguably of English literature — a play that stares into the worst the world can do to a person and refuses to look away or offer comfort.
Ready to Read King Lear?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: