Editors Reads Verdict
One of Auster's shortest and most affecting novels — a meditation on loyalty, loss, and what home means, seen through a dog's consciousness that manages to be both utterly convincing and metaphysically charged.
What We Loved
- The dog narrator is one of the most successful in contemporary fiction — Mr. Bones's perspective is consistent, emotionally coherent, and philosophically interesting without being anthropomorphised beyond plausibility
- Willy G. Christmas is a memorable portrait of the genuine outsider artist — brilliant, homeless, utterly impractical
- The novel's brevity (181 pages) gives it a concentrated emotional impact
Minor Drawbacks
- The human characters seen through Mr. Bones's perspective are necessarily limited by what a dog can understand
- Some readers find the central conceit too slight to sustain a whole novel, however short
- The ending, while consistent with the novel's premises, is difficult
Key Takeaways
- → Loyalty is the form love takes in creatures that cannot speak
- → Homelessness is not simply poverty but the absence of the claim to belonging that home provides
- → A life lived in devotion to something — even poetry no one reads — has a completeness that more practical lives can lack
| Author | Paul Auster |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Picador |
| Pages | 181 |
| Published | March 1, 2000 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction |
| Difficulty | Beginner |
| Best For | Readers who want an accessible, emotionally affecting Auster novel; those interested in animal narrators, homelessness, and the figure of the unrecognised artist. |
Willy G. Christmas, Poet and Wanderer
Willy G. Christmas is dying. He knows this, and Mr. Bones — his dog, his companion of seven years, the only audience for the torrent of words that Willy produces without cease — knows it too, in the way dogs know the things that matter most. Willy is a homeless man in his late thirties who has been wandering the streets and parks and shelters of America for years, carrying a backpack full of manuscripts that no publisher has ever expressed interest in and a mind that runs, constantly, on the rails of language.
Auster renders Willy with great care: he is not a tragic figure in the sentimental sense, not a romanticised holy fool, but a specific person whose intelligence and verbal gifts coexist with an almost complete inability to manage the practical requirements of being alive. He talks to Mr. Bones in extended monologues — about poetry, about America, about his past, about Timbuktu, the place beyond death where he expects to go and which he has described to Mr. Bones in enough detail that the dog has a fairly complete picture of the afterlife. The monologues are funny and sad and shot through with genuine literary quality.
Mr. Bones’s narration captures Willy’s voice while filtering it through a consciousness that cannot fully decode it — the dog understands loyalty and presence and the rhythm of a voice he loves, and this is more than enough to give us Willy whole.
The Journey to Baltimore
Willy has decided that he must find Mrs. Swanson — the Baltimore schoolteacher who, when Willy was a boy, recognised something in him and told him he could be a writer. She has not seen him in decades. He does not know if she is still alive. But the logic of a dying man is not the logic of a practical one, and Willy is determined to deliver his manuscripts to the person who first believed in them, to make her the custodian of a work that the rest of the world has declined to recognise.
The journey from New York to Baltimore is short in miles but enormous in the difficulty of travelling it on foot, sick, with a dog, and without money. Auster traces it with documentary precision: the shelter nights, the roadside stops, the small violences and accidental kindnesses of life at the margins. Mr. Bones navigates this world through smell and sound and the steady orientation of his attention toward Willy — where Willy goes, Mr. Bones goes, not as obedience but as the physical expression of a bond that has no other form.
What they find in Baltimore is not resolution. Mrs. Swanson has moved. The manuscripts do not reach their intended reader. Willy dies in a city that does not know him, and the journey’s logic — the conviction that if he could just deliver the work, something would be completed — turns out to be the logic of love rather than of endings, which rarely match.
Mr. Bones Alone
After Willy’s death, the novel becomes something stranger: a dog’s attempt to survive and to understand what survival without the person who gave it meaning actually consists of. Mr. Bones moves through a series of households — a kind family, a less kind one, a child who loves him — and each encounter is rendered through the dog’s sensory and emotional intelligence in ways that illuminate the humans more sharply than a human narrator might.
What Mr. Bones is looking for, without being able to name it, is home — the specific form of belonging that Willy, homeless and impractical, had somehow provided simply by being present and by talking endlessly to a dog who understood the love inside the words if not always the words themselves. Each household offers something, but not that. The dog’s grief is not stated but enacted in his behaviour, in the restlessness that no comfortable bed quite cures.
The ending of Timbuktu is consistent with everything Auster has established about the novel’s premises, and it is hard. Auster does not flinch from what the logic of Mr. Bones’s situation requires. The novel’s title — that country beyond death that Willy described so fully — comes to feel, by the end, less like a joke and more like the name of something Mr. Bones has been moving toward since the first page.
Our rating: 4.0/5 — A short, quietly devastating novel about loyalty and loss, narrated by a dog whose consciousness Auster renders with remarkable conviction, and whose grief for his owner is one of the most honest portraits of devotion in his work.
Reading Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Timbuktu" about?
Narrated by Mr. Bones, a dog, as he accompanies his dying owner Willy G. Christmas — a homeless poet of genuine but unrecognised talent — to Baltimore to find Willy's former teacher, and then navigates the world alone after Willy's death.
Who should read "Timbuktu"?
Readers who want an accessible, emotionally affecting Auster novel; those interested in animal narrators, homelessness, and the figure of the unrecognised artist.
What are the key takeaways from "Timbuktu"?
Loyalty is the form love takes in creatures that cannot speak Homelessness is not simply poverty but the absence of the claim to belonging that home provides A life lived in devotion to something — even poetry no one reads — has a completeness that more practical lives can lack
Is "Timbuktu" worth reading?
One of Auster's shortest and most affecting novels — a meditation on loyalty, loss, and what home means, seen through a dog's consciousness that manages to be both utterly convincing and metaphysically charged.
Ready to Read Timbuktu?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: