Editors Reads Verdict
The most Kafka-esque of Auster's novels — a stripped-down allegory about freedom, labour, and the arbitrary nature of the systems that constrain us, in which a card game becomes a trap and a wall becomes a life sentence.
What We Loved
- The allegorical clarity — the wall as arbitrary and absolute authority, Nashe and Pozzi as subjects of a system they cannot appeal — is executed without heavy-handedness
- The relationship between Nashe and Pozzi is the most fully dramatised male friendship in Auster's fiction
- The novel's brevity (217 pages) gives it the force of a compressed nightmare
Minor Drawbacks
- The allegorical intent is so clear that some readers find the novel schematic — a parable rather than a novel
- Flower and Stone, the millionaires, are deliberately cartoonish, which serves the allegory but limits their reality
- The ending is abrupt and leaves some readers unsatisfied
Key Takeaways
- → Freedom is not an absence of constraint but a relationship between a self and the systems that surround it
- → Chance is not random — it finds the vulnerabilities in whatever order a person has constructed for themselves
- → Labour under constraint is not redeemed by its product; the wall means nothing except what Nashe and Pozzi are forced to bring to it
| Author | Paul Auster |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Penguin Books |
| Pages | 217 |
| Published | February 1, 1992 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, Philosophical Fiction |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Readers of Auster interested in his more allegorical mode; fans of Kafka, Beckett, and philosophical fiction about constraint and freedom. |
Nashe on the Road
Jim Nashe is a Boston firefighter whose life has come apart in a sequence of events he barely resisted: his wife left him, taking their daughter; his father, a man he never knew, died and left him an inheritance of $200,000. Nashe takes the money, puts his daughter in the care of his sister, and begins driving. The novel opens with him already a year into this project — he has driven tens of thousands of miles, spent half the inheritance on motels and gas and the simple maintenance of forward motion, and has no destination and no intention of finding one.
Auster renders the driving not as freedom but as its simulation: Nashe is moving, which is not the same as going somewhere. The road in American mythology is where a person finds themselves; Nashe’s road is where a person empties out. He drives because the alternative — stopping, accounting for what his life has become — is more than he can manage. The inheritance makes the driving possible, and as it diminishes, so does the fiction that the driving is a choice rather than a flight. When Nashe spots Pozzi walking along the side of a road, bloodied and beaten, and stops to pick him up, it is the first decision he has made in a year that has any content. Pozzi, a professional card player with a proposition, gives Nashe somewhere to drive toward, which turns out to be the worst thing that could happen to him.
The Card Game
Pozzi’s proposition is straightforward: he is a gifted poker player who has heard of two eccentric millionaires, Flower and Stone, who like to gamble and are easy marks. Nashe will stake him; they will split the winnings. Flower and Stone live on a vast Pennsylvania estate and have spent years constructing a model city in the basement of their mansion — a scale recreation of an imagined medieval world, painstakingly detailed, visited by no one except themselves. They are, in Auster’s portrait, less characters than embodiments: wealth so complete that reality has become optional, whim has become law, and the passage of time is marked only by the elaboration of the model city.
The card game that Pozzi loses is the novel’s structural hinge. He loses everything — Nashe’s stake, his own money, and more besides — and the debt they owe is denominated not in cash but in labour: they will build a wall from the stones of a castle Flower has had shipped from Ireland, working until the debt is cleared. The terms seem manageable. They are not. The wall is built in a field with no apparent purpose; Flower and Stone’s accountant, Murks, oversees the work with bureaucratic precision; the days accumulate; the wall rises; and the terms of the debt keep expanding in ways that are always, technically, within the contract they signed. Kafka’s influence is evident not in the surface absurdity but in the mechanism: the system is internally consistent, and it is exactly this consistency that makes it inescapable.
Building the Wall
The wall-building sequences are the novel’s moral and philosophical core. Nashe and Pozzi work through the Pennsylvania summer, housed in a trailer on the estate grounds, fed by Murks, watched at a distance by Flower and Stone, who occasionally visit to observe the progress with the serene satisfaction of men whose project is proceeding as planned. The wall is made of real stone and will be a real wall when finished, but it encloses nothing and connects nothing — it is a wall in a field, and its only function is to exist as the product of their labour and the instrument of their debt.
What this costs each man is different. Pozzi breaks first: impatient, constitutionally unable to accept a situation he cannot gamble his way out of, he attempts to escape and is returned, beaten, in a condition that worsens as the novel progresses. Nashe, who has been emptying out since he started driving, finds in the wall’s simple labour a structure his life on the road lacked — the work gives the days a shape, and he is not entirely sure this is a bad thing. This ambivalence is the novel’s most unsettling note: the man who was driving to stay free finds something like meaning in building a wall that imprisons him. Auster leaves the final image — Nashe driving, finally, away from the estate, into an ending that the novel refuses to clarify — as a question about whether escape from one kind of constraint is ever more than a delivery into another.
Our rating: 4.2/5 — The most Kafka-esque of Auster’s novels, a compressed and lucid allegory about freedom and constraint in which a card game and a wall do the work that a hundred pages of argument could not.
Reading Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "The Music of Chance" about?
Jim Nashe, a former firefighter driving aimlessly through America with his inheritance, picks up a young gambler named Pozzi — and after losing everything in a card game against two eccentric millionaires, they find themselves building a medieval wall in a Pennsylvania field to pay off their debt.
Who should read "The Music of Chance"?
Readers of Auster interested in his more allegorical mode; fans of Kafka, Beckett, and philosophical fiction about constraint and freedom.
What are the key takeaways from "The Music of Chance"?
Freedom is not an absence of constraint but a relationship between a self and the systems that surround it Chance is not random — it finds the vulnerabilities in whatever order a person has constructed for themselves Labour under constraint is not redeemed by its product; the wall means nothing except what Nashe and Pozzi are forced to bring to it
Is "The Music of Chance" worth reading?
The most Kafka-esque of Auster's novels — a stripped-down allegory about freedom, labour, and the arbitrary nature of the systems that constrain us, in which a card game becomes a trap and a wall becomes a life sentence.
Ready to Read The Music of Chance?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: