Editors Reads Verdict
Christie's most audacious structural trick: the ABC format seems to define a serial killer narrative, but Christie uses that expectation as misdirection, and the solution is one of the most satisfying reversals in classic detective fiction.
What We Loved
- The serial killer format is used as misdirection with complete structural control — Christie at her most architecturally inventive
- The Cust dual-perspective creates dramatic irony Christie manages without a single misstep
- Poirot's insistence that the alphabetical pattern is a screen distinguishes him from every other investigator on the case
- The solution reframes the entire novel on rereading — all necessary information was present throughout
Minor Drawbacks
- Readers who have encountered the plot's structural trick in discussion may have the misdirection spoiled before they begin
- Hastings as narrator is less compelling than in some Poirot novels — his function here is largely functional
- The actual victims receive limited characterisation given how central their deaths are to the plot
Key Takeaways
- → Patterns that seem to define a crime can be constructed specifically to misdirect investigators away from a much simpler truth
- → Serial killer conventions can be weaponised as cover for something far more intimate and personal
- → Poirot's method — attending to psychology rather than physical evidence — solves what purely procedural investigation cannot
- → The most audacious mystery structures exploit reader expectations built up by the genre itself
| Author | Agatha Christie |
|---|---|
| Publisher | William Morrow |
| Pages | 256 |
| Published | January 6, 1936 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Mystery, Crime Fiction, Classic Mystery, Detective Fiction |
The ABC Murders Review
Published in 1936, The ABC Murders represents Agatha Christie at her most structurally inventive. The setup is deceptively simple: Hercule Poirot receives a taunting letter from someone calling themselves ABC, predicting a murder in Andover. The murder happens. Another letter follows, predicting a murder in Bexhill. That murder happens too. The pattern seems clear — a serial killer working alphabetically through British towns, with an ABC Railway Guide left at each scene.
Christie’s genius is to make the pattern itself the misdirection. By 1936, she had already published The Murder of Roger Ackroyd and Murder on the Orient Express, demonstrating that she understood how deeply readers invest in the conventions of the detective genre — and how thoroughly those conventions can be exploited. The ABC Murders performs a similar trick, but with the serial killer format rather than the locked-room mystery.
The novel’s structure is also unusually modern for Christie. The investigation is told partly from the perspective of Captain Hastings (Poirot’s Watson), and partly through chapters following a man named Alexander Bonaparte Cust — a commercial traveller who finds himself in each murder location without being able to account for his time. This dual perspective creates a form of dramatic irony that Christie manages with complete control.
Poirot himself is in fine form. His insistence that the alphabetical pattern is a screen rather than the truth sets him apart from every other investigator on the case, and his reasoning — which pays careful attention to what a serial killer pattern would actually obscure — is genuinely satisfying when it unfolds.
Our rating: 4.4/5 — Christie’s cleverest structural gambit, deploying serial killer conventions as cover for something far more intimate.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "The ABC Murders" about?
Hercule Poirot receives a taunting letter predicting a murder — and the victim's name begins with A, the murder location begins with A, and a copy of the ABC railway guide is left at the scene. The killer works alphabetically, and the police assume a serial killer with no motive. Poirot is certain the obvious answer is a decoy.
What are the key takeaways from "The ABC Murders"?
Patterns that seem to define a crime can be constructed specifically to misdirect investigators away from a much simpler truth Serial killer conventions can be weaponised as cover for something far more intimate and personal Poirot's method — attending to psychology rather than physical evidence — solves what purely procedural investigation cannot The most audacious mystery structures exploit reader expectations built up by the genre itself
Is "The ABC Murders" worth reading?
Christie's most audacious structural trick: the ABC format seems to define a serial killer narrative, but Christie uses that expectation as misdirection, and the solution is one of the most satisfying reversals in classic detective fiction.
Ready to Read The ABC Murders?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: