Editors Reads Verdict
Robinson's most socially grounded novel is the one most directly engaged with poverty and dispossession, and the one that most directly confronts what Christian faith means for someone the world has tried to discard.
What We Loved
- Lila herself is a triumph of characterisation — her wariness, her intelligence, and her slow opening to love are entirely convincing
- The novel's engagement with Ezekiel — particularly the passage about the infant abandoned in the field — gives the book a theological depth that feels earned rather than imposed
- The romance between Lila and Ames is the most tender thing Robinson has written
Minor Drawbacks
- The non-linear structure, moving between Lila's past and present, occasionally makes the chronology difficult to follow
- The theological discussions, though central to the book's meaning, require patience from readers not already engaged with the questions
Key Takeaways
- → Lila's question — what happens to the people who were never given a chance to live decently — is the hardest theological question in the Gilead sequence, and Robinson does not pretend to answer it
- → Love, for Robinson, is not a sentiment but a form of attention — Ames's love for Lila is expressed as careful, unhurried seeing
- → Doll's protectiveness of Lila is a form of grace operating outside any institutional framework — the novel's implicit argument that grace is not confined to the church
- → Baptism, for Lila, is not conversion but a choice to belong — to accept the claim that the community makes on her, knowing she can leave
| Author | Marilynne Robinson |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Farrar |
| Pages | 272 |
| Published | October 7, 2014 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction, American Literature, Religious Fiction |
Lila Review
Lila is the third novel in Robinson’s Gilead sequence, but it is in important ways the most independent of them: it can be read without the others, and its concerns — poverty, dispossession, the question of what religious faith means to someone who has been abandoned by every human institution — are more socially urgent than the more insular theological preoccupations of Gilead and Home.
The novel alternates between Lila’s past — her childhood as a stolen infant raised by the drifter Doll, her years on the American roads in the Depression, her time in a St. Louis brothel — and her present in Gilead, where she has arrived by accident, sat down in the back of an old preacher’s church, and begun the improbable process of being loved by him. The two timelines are not kept neatly separate; Lila’s mind moves between them, and the novel’s structure mimics the way the past inhabits the present rather than preceding it.
The central theological question Lila poses — the question she asks Ames directly, and that the novel circles throughout — is what happens to the people who were simply not given a decent chance: Doll, who stole her out of love and raised her in poverty; the men and women who drifted through her childhood, working when they could and starving when they could not; the people for whom the conventional promises of religion were never available. Robinson does not offer a comforting answer. She sits with the question, which is the more honest response.
The romance between Lila and Ames is the warmest thing in the Gilead sequence — Robinson’s most openly affectionate writing — and it works because she refuses to make it simple. Lila does not understand why Ames loves her; she expects it to end, makes plans to leave, keeps the knife she has always carried. Her slow, watchful opening to the possibility of being cared for is the most psychologically precise portrait of what it means to have learned, very early, that trust is dangerous. Lila is Robinson at her most human and her most precise simultaneously, which is a difficult combination to achieve.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Lila" about?
The third Gilead novel tells the story of John Ames's young wife — the drifter Lila, who grew up in poverty on the American roads, cared for by the woman Doll who stole her as an infant — and how she came to arrive in Gilead and sit down in the back of an old preacher's church.
What are the key takeaways from "Lila"?
Lila's question — what happens to the people who were never given a chance to live decently — is the hardest theological question in the Gilead sequence, and Robinson does not pretend to answer it Love, for Robinson, is not a sentiment but a form of attention — Ames's love for Lila is expressed as careful, unhurried seeing Doll's protectiveness of Lila is a form of grace operating outside any institutional framework — the novel's implicit argument that grace is not confined to the church Baptism, for Lila, is not conversion but a choice to belong — to accept the claim that the community makes on her, knowing she can leave
Is "Lila" worth reading?
Robinson's most socially grounded novel is the one most directly engaged with poverty and dispossession, and the one that most directly confronts what Christian faith means for someone the world has tried to discard.
Ready to Read Lila?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: