Editors Reads Verdict
Adiga's most novelistically complete work — the moral study of a community's capitulation to money, and one man's refusal, told with the same clear-eyed intelligence as The White Tiger but with more sympathy for all parties.
What We Loved
- The ensemble cast — each resident of Vishram Society with their own calculation about the offer — is rendered with genuine depth
- Mumbai's specific real estate dynamics are portrayed with documentary accuracy
- The moral complexity is real — Masterji's refusal is both heroic and selfish, and Adiga holds both truths
Minor Drawbacks
- The final section requires more from readers than the setup entirely prepares them for
- Some characters in the ensemble are less developed than others
Key Takeaways
- → Money offered to a community does not corrupt it — it reveals what was already there
- → A principled refusal is also an imposition on everyone who wanted to accept
- → Mumbai's real estate market is a specific form of violence that is entirely legal
| Author | Aravind Adiga |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Free Press |
| Pages | 381 |
| Published | July 12, 2011 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Fiction |
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Best For | Readers of The White Tiger who want Adiga's most morally complex and novelistically substantial work. |
The Offer
Vishram Society, Tower A, in the suburb of Vakola, Mumbai. A developer named Dharmen Shah has bought the land around the building and wants the last remaining plot — on which the seven-storey, fifty-year-old housing society stands. He offers every resident a sum that would transform their lives.
They all accept. All but Masterji — Yogesh Murthy, sixty-one, a recently widowed retired schoolteacher, who has lived in his flat for decades and refuses.
What happens to a community when it has decided that one member is the only obstacle between it and its desire is the subject of Last Man in Tower. It is not a comfortable subject.
Moral Complexity
Adiga’s achievement is to make Masterji’s refusal simultaneously admirable and maddening. He is principled; he is also inflexible in ways that impose real costs on people who have legitimate reasons for wanting to move. The other residents are not simply greedy; they are people in genuine need — medical bills, children’s education, impossible rents — for whom the offer represents a way out.
The novel works as a moral study rather than a moral allegory: Adiga does not load the deck. The developer is not a cartoon villain. The residents are not simply cowardly. Masterji is not simply heroic. Mumbai is not simply cruel. All of the above are partly true and the novel’s pressure comes from that partial truth being held steady throughout.
Our rating: 4.1/5 — Adiga’s most novelistically complete work: a precise moral study of what happens to a community when money asks it to choose.
Reading Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Last Man in Tower" about?
A Mumbai developer offers the residents of a crumbling housing society an enormous sum to vacate — all but one agree. Masterji, a retired schoolteacher, refuses. What happens to him is the novel.
Who should read "Last Man in Tower"?
Readers of The White Tiger who want Adiga's most morally complex and novelistically substantial work.
What are the key takeaways from "Last Man in Tower"?
Money offered to a community does not corrupt it — it reveals what was already there A principled refusal is also an imposition on everyone who wanted to accept Mumbai's real estate market is a specific form of violence that is entirely legal
Is "Last Man in Tower" worth reading?
Adiga's most novelistically complete work — the moral study of a community's capitulation to money, and one man's refusal, told with the same clear-eyed intelligence as The White Tiger but with more sympathy for all parties.
Ready to Read Last Man in Tower?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: