Editors Reads Verdict
Lewis writes this as the story of someone he genuinely could not figure out — and that admission of uncertainty makes it the most honest piece of journalism about the FTX collapse, even if it is not the most satisfying. The ambiguity is the point, and some readers find that unsatisfying.
What We Loved
- The intimate access to SBF before the collapse is irreplaceable — no other journalist got this close for this long
- Lewis's honesty about his own uncertainty is more journalistically rigorous than false confidence would be
- The FTX-at-its-height atmosphere — Bahamas compound, effective altruism culture, coexisting competence and chaos — is brilliantly captured
- Lewis is a beautiful prose stylist and the writing itself rewards reading regardless of the subject
Minor Drawbacks
- The book is more impressionistic than forensic — readers wanting a clear account of how the fraud actually happened will be frustrated
- Lewis's ambivalence about SBF's guilt can feel like special pleading given the jury's verdict
- The structural decision to avoid a clear conclusion leaves the book feeling unresolved rather than deliberately open
Key Takeaways
- → Effective altruism culture at FTX convinced everyone involved they were doing planetary good — the ideology was load-bearing in enabling poor decisions
- → SBF's unusual cognitive style — possibly autistic, certainly non-standard — made him simultaneously compelling to investors and impossible to read accurately
- → Financial systems that grow too fast outstrip the capacity of anyone inside them to understand the full picture
- → The gap between genuine trading brilliance and organisational chaos can be large enough to contain catastrophic fraud
- → Journalists embedded with subjects before a disaster face an irresolvable tension between intimacy and accountability
| Author | Michael Lewis |
|---|---|
| Publisher | W.W. Norton |
| Pages | 272 |
| Published | October 3, 2023 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Non-Fiction, Finance, True Crime, Biography |
Going Infinite Review
Michael Lewis published Going Infinite while Sam Bankman-Fried was on trial for fraud, and the timing could not have been more awkward. Lewis had spent a year with SBF and FTX before the collapse; his book, by his own account, was meant to be the story of an eccentric genius reshaping global finance through effective altruism and cryptocurrency. What he ended up with was a portrait of a man who may have committed one of the largest financial frauds in history — and Lewis had to decide how to write it anyway.
His decision was to be honest about his own uncertainty. This is either the book’s greatest strength or its most frustrating quality, depending on what you want from it. Lewis does not conclude that SBF is a calculating fraudster or an oblivious idealist who lost control of something too large for him to manage. He presents the evidence for both interpretations and acknowledges he cannot determine which is true. The prosecutors and the jury concluded otherwise, but Lewis is writing journalism, not a verdict.
What Going Infinite captures brilliantly is the atmosphere of FTX at its height: the absurdity of the Bahamas compound, the effective altruism culture that convinced everyone involved they were saving the world, the incompetence that apparently coexisted with genuine trading brilliance, the way SBF’s particular brain — possibly autistic, certainly unusual — processed risk and relationships in ways that made him simultaneously compelling and unknowable.
Lewis is a beautiful writer and Going Infinite is a beautifully written book. It is less satisfying as a forensic account of how the fraud happened, because Lewis is candid that he does not entirely know, and the prosecutors’ version was still being constructed when he wrote it.
For readers who want narrative intimacy with one of the strangest financial stories of the decade, this is the essential text. For readers who want accountability and explanation, it will frustrate.
Our rating: 4.0/5 — An unusual Lewis book — more impressionistic than analytic — but the intimate access to SBF makes it irreplaceable as a document of the FTX era.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Going Infinite" about?
Lewis spent a year embedded with Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX before the cryptocurrency exchange's catastrophic collapse. The result is a portrait of the man at the centre of one of the largest financial frauds in history — a portrait that refuses easy categorisation of SBF as either visionary or villain.
What are the key takeaways from "Going Infinite"?
Effective altruism culture at FTX convinced everyone involved they were doing planetary good — the ideology was load-bearing in enabling poor decisions SBF's unusual cognitive style — possibly autistic, certainly non-standard — made him simultaneously compelling to investors and impossible to read accurately Financial systems that grow too fast outstrip the capacity of anyone inside them to understand the full picture The gap between genuine trading brilliance and organisational chaos can be large enough to contain catastrophic fraud Journalists embedded with subjects before a disaster face an irresolvable tension between intimacy and accountability
Is "Going Infinite" worth reading?
Lewis writes this as the story of someone he genuinely could not figure out — and that admission of uncertainty makes it the most honest piece of journalism about the FTX collapse, even if it is not the most satisfying. The ambiguity is the point, and some readers find that unsatisfying.
Ready to Read Going Infinite?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: