Brief Interviews with Hideous Men

The Men Who Are Speaking

The title series — seven ‘Brief Interviews with Hideous Men,’ labeled B.I. #‘s and distributed across the collection — consists of transcripts in which an unnamed interviewer’s questions are represented only by ‘Q.’ The interviewees are men who are, in various ways, monstrous: a man who has discovered that confessing his manipulation tactics to women makes the tactics more effective; a man who explains at length why his most repugnant behavior was actually a form of respect; a man whose sexual violence is rendered in the cool language of self-justification. The interviewer’s silence is not passive. It accumulates, and by the end of the series it is the loudest thing in the room.

Wallace’s formal choice — giving us only the men’s voices — is an argument about how misogyny operates through language. These men are not inarticulate. They are hyperarticulate. They have constructed elaborate verbal architectures that convert their behavior into its opposite: the selfishness becomes consideration, the cruelty becomes honesty, the violence becomes intimacy. The reader’s discomfort comes not from failing to understand these constructions but from understanding them too well — from recognizing the logic while refusing the conclusion. The series is, among other things, a study in how intelligence can be deployed in the service of bad faith.

Formal Experiments and Their Arguments

The collection’s most discussed individual piece is ‘The Depressed Person,’ a story narrated by and about a woman whose depression has rendered her incapable of genuine connection. The story is written in an obsessive, recursive, heavily parenthetical prose that enacts the mind it describes: the constant self-monitoring, the compulsive qualification, the inability to finish a thought without immediately questioning the thought’s adequacy. It is technically demanding in a specific way — the style is the content, and reading it requires the same kind of sustained, uncomfortable attention that the narrator cannot bring to anything.

‘Adult World,’ divided into two parts, tells the story of a woman’s gradual understanding of her husband’s sexual past — Part I in dense, anxious prose, Part II as a bare outline, suggesting that the story resists the conventional narrative form that would contain it. ‘Forever Overhead,’ by contrast, is the collection’s most straightforwardly beautiful piece: a second-person present-tense account of a thirteen-year-old boy’s decision to jump from a high-dive platform, which is also, with extraordinary compression, about the moment of choosing adulthood. It is the piece most readers point to as evidence that Wallace could write spare, direct, emotionally precise prose when the argument required it.

The Self Colonized by Irony

The collection’s deepest concern is what Wallace had identified in his essay ‘E Unibus Pluram’: that postmodern irony had colonized American selfhood so thoroughly that genuine expression — sincerity, vulnerability, the direct statement of what one actually feels — had become almost impossible, and that the people most damaged by this colonization were not the ones who had opted out of irony but the ones who were most thoroughly inside it. The hideous men are maximally self-aware and maximally toxic. Their self-awareness is not a path to self-correction but a tool for self-justification.

This creates the collection’s central tension. Wallace was himself a maximally self-aware writer operating inside a postmodern tradition he was trying to escape. The ‘Brief Interviews’ series is both a critique of a kind of masculinity and an act of formal complicity with it: the elaborate, recursive, self-qualifying prose style that the narrator of ‘The Depressed Person’ cannot escape is recognizably related to Wallace’s own. The collection does not resolve this tension — it performs it, honestly and with considerable discomfort. That discomfort is what makes it endure.

Our rating: 4.1/5 — A formally restless, often uncomfortable collection that is most valuable as a document of a major writer working through the contradictions of self-awareness: knowing what you are doing, and doing it anyway, and asking what that means.