Editors Reads Verdict
The best book about how fiction works published in decades — Saunders's method of reading 'in the direction the story is already going' is both a practical technique and a philosophy of fiction that illuminates every story it touches.
What We Loved
- The method is immediately usable — Saunders's reading technique is something readers and writers can apply to any fiction
- The Russian stories selected are genuinely great and perfectly calibrated to demonstrate different formal strategies
- The voice is warm and self-questioning — this is a master teaching, not a master lecturing
Minor Drawbacks
- The length reflects its classroom origin — some readers will find the step-by-step analysis more granular than necessary
- Those already deeply familiar with Chekhov may find some of the foundational analysis familiar
Key Takeaways
- → Fiction works by creating and then either fulfilling or frustrating the reader's expectations — this is the engine of narrative
- → Reading 'in the direction the story is already going' means attending to what the story is trying to become, not imposing an external framework
- → The Russian masters are supreme because they allow their characters to be fully themselves — they do not simplify for effect
- → Every sentence either escalates or de-escalates the story's energy — the writer must know which is happening and why
| Author | George Saunders |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Random House |
| Pages | 432 |
| Published | January 12, 2021 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary Criticism, Writing Craft, Russian Literature |
A Swim in a Pond in the Rain Review
George Saunders has been teaching Russian short fiction at Syracuse University’s MFA program for more than twenty years. A Swim in a Pond in the Rain is what that teaching looks like when written down: seven stories — by Chekhov, Turgenev, Tolstoy, and Gogol — presented in full, with Saunders’s commentary interspersed through and after each one, asking at every stage what the story is doing and why, and what a writer can learn from watching it do it.
The method Saunders calls reading “in the direction the story is already going.” Rather than arriving with a critical framework and applying it, he reads each story as a reader — attending to what he notices, what he doesn’t notice, where his attention sharpens and where it drifts, what the story makes him want and when it delivers it — and then, retrospectively, asks why the story produced those effects. The result is less a critical analysis than a phenomenology of reading: a record of what it is like to encounter a great story and a set of questions that illuminate what made the experience possible.
The stories selected are calibrated to teach different lessons. Chekhov’s “In the Cart” demonstrates the power of understatement — how much emotional weight a story can carry without ever making it explicit. Tolstoy’s “Alyosha the Pot” shows what happens when a writer refuses to sentimentalise: Alyosha is a simple man whose goodness is rendered with absolute lack of condescension, and the result is devastating precisely because it doesn’t reach for devastation. Gogol’s “The Nose” teaches something entirely different — the way absurdist premises can be inhabited with such internal logic that they become more real than realism.
The book’s deepest argument is about what fiction is for. Saunders argues — through close reading rather than through assertion — that great fiction changes the reader’s consciousness, and that it does this not through the explicit statement of truths but through the experience of being inside a particular sensibility for the duration of a story. The Russian masters are supreme, in his account, because their sensibilities are so fully themselves: they do not simplify their characters, do not make the moral arithmetic easy, do not protect either themselves or the reader from what is actually there. A Swim in a Pond in the Rain is the most useful account of how fiction actually works that has been published in recent years, and it is useful in the way that good teaching is useful: it changes how you read everything after.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "A Swim in a Pond in the Rain" about?
Seven Russian short stories by Chekhov, Turgenev, Tolstoy, and Gogol, with Saunders's line-by-line commentary on what each story is doing and why. Developed from his Syracuse MFA course, the book is a master class in how fiction creates meaning through moment-by-moment decisions of form.
What are the key takeaways from "A Swim in a Pond in the Rain"?
Fiction works by creating and then either fulfilling or frustrating the reader's expectations — this is the engine of narrative Reading 'in the direction the story is already going' means attending to what the story is trying to become, not imposing an external framework The Russian masters are supreme because they allow their characters to be fully themselves — they do not simplify for effect Every sentence either escalates or de-escalates the story's energy — the writer must know which is happening and why
Is "A Swim in a Pond in the Rain" worth reading?
The best book about how fiction works published in decades — Saunders's method of reading 'in the direction the story is already going' is both a practical technique and a philosophy of fiction that illuminates every story it touches.
Ready to Read A Swim in a Pond in the Rain?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: