Editors Reads Verdict
Forever Peace won the Hugo, Nebula, and John W. Campbell Memorial Awards — the same triple that The Forever War achieved. A companion rather than a sequel, it applies Haldeman's anti-war intelligence to a new near-future technology: the neural-linked remote combat system that makes killing clean for soldiers while keeping the dying distant and therefore politically invisible.
What We Loved
- The soldierboy technology is rigorously imagined and its psychological implications are carefully explored
- The neural linking concept — and its unexpected pacifying side effect — is the novel's most original idea
- Haldeman's physics background gives the Big Bang weapon subplot genuine scientific texture
Minor Drawbacks
- The thriller plot involving the weapon occasionally overwhelms the more interesting character work
- The secondary romantic subplot is less developed than the novel's central relationship
Key Takeaways
- → Remote warfare removes the psychological cost of killing from soldiers, which changes the politics of war
- → Neural sharing — genuine empathic connection — may be incompatible with sustained violence
- → Religious fundamentalism and technological extremism can be functionally identical in their logic
| Author | Joe Haldeman |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Ace Books |
| Pages | 351 |
| Published | August 1, 1997 |
| Language | English |
| Genre | Science Fiction, Military Science Fiction, Thriller |
The War That Doesn’t Feel Like War
Joe Haldeman’s Forever Peace is not a sequel to The Forever War — it shares no characters, no narrative, no continuity — but it is unmistakably a companion: another attempt to think through war’s psychological and social mechanics using a science fiction premise that makes the central question unavoidable. Where The Forever War used time dilation to examine the veteran’s alienation, Forever Peace uses neural-linked remote combat to examine what happens when killing is made clean.
In 2043, the wealthy nations fight their wars through soldierboys — enormous robotic fighting machines operated by soldiers who are remotely linked to them via neural jacks. A team of ten soldiers share each other’s consciousness during operations; they feel each other’s emotions, access each other’s memories, experience combat through the soldierboy’s sensors without risking their own bodies. Meanwhile, the people being killed by the soldierboys — in this case, the populations of the developing world — die in the ordinary way.
The Pacification Effect
The novel’s most original idea is also its most disturbing: extended neural linking — “jacking in” — appears to have a permanent pacifying effect on soldiers who spend enough time sharing another person’s consciousness completely. They become incapable of sustained violence. The military is therefore caught in a paradox: the technology that makes war politically painless for the operators also makes those operators unable to continue fighting.
Haldeman uses this discovery as both thriller mechanism and ethical argument. If genuine empathy — the direct experience of another person’s inner life — is incompatible with violence, what does that tell us about war’s ordinary psychological requirements?
Physics and Apocalypse
The novel’s second plot — in which protagonist Julian Class, a physicist who also operates soldierboys, discovers that a group of religious extremists intends to use a new accelerator to recreate the Big Bang — is the book’s weaker half. Haldeman’s scientific background gives it credibility, but the thriller mechanics require a different pace and emotional register from the soldierboy sequences, and the transition is sometimes jarring.
The novel’s resolution is among Haldeman’s most deliberately utopian — a controversial choice that divides readers who find it earned from those who find it too convenient.
Our rating: 4.0/5
Frequently Asked Questions
What is "Forever Peace" about?
In 2043, American soldiers fight a distant war by remotely operating robotic killing machines called soldierboys — linked neurally in teams of ten — while a physicist discovers a plot to recreate the Big Bang that would destroy the universe.
What are the key takeaways from "Forever Peace"?
Remote warfare removes the psychological cost of killing from soldiers, which changes the politics of war Neural sharing — genuine empathic connection — may be incompatible with sustained violence Religious fundamentalism and technological extremism can be functionally identical in their logic
Is "Forever Peace" worth reading?
Forever Peace won the Hugo, Nebula, and John W. Campbell Memorial Awards — the same triple that The Forever War achieved. A companion rather than a sequel, it applies Haldeman's anti-war intelligence to a new near-future technology: the neural-linked remote combat system that makes killing clean for soldiers while keeping the dying distant and therefore politically invisible.
Ready to Read Forever Peace?
Check the current price on Amazon.
Check Price on Amazon (paid link)Prices and availability are subject to change. See Amazon for current price.
Review last updated: